23 décembre 2009

The Couture House: More than the Name




















Gentle Reader -

Surely you've not been fooled by equity firms (among others) who have acquired the names of once-great couture houses.

The fashion collections produced by these half-dead houses, while on-trend, is less than stellar - and certainly does not live up to the standards of those same names sewn inside of the clothing.

It would be too easy - and too unkind - to list the many Parisian fashion houses here. However, it is more instructive to give one successful example:

Balenciaga under Monsieur G.


Balenciaga no longer produces haute couture (such as the vintage example above), but remains edgy, at the forefront of fashion. Certainly the clothing is much different than when Cristobal himself presided, but the spirit of the house remains. Why? Here are some thoughts for those fashion executives overseeing the number-crunching:

1. To own a fashion house, you must know fashion. La mode is not the same as producing lacquered pens. Fashion is a part of luxury, but requires spirit. This is powerful - and can be dangerous. Lagerfeld himself has on more than one occasion referred to Mademoiselle's ghost.

2. A designer is more than an employee. Or at least should be. The designer is that person who should give life to a house. I can't say how a designer breathes life to the fashion created, but there is a difference between clothing with life - and mere clothing. A replaceable employee is often loathe to give more than technical ability. Often, ideas are withheld as well, to say nothing of dreams and one's own essence.

3. Trends are not meant to be followed, but played with. In the current era of Big Fashion, everything seems to be reduced to the Numbers. And the Numbers are afraid of not creating profit. And so the Numbers direct the designer-employee to be as on-trend as possible.

Trends exist, but it is a designer's ability to play with trends - emphasizing here, diminishing (or discarding) there - that produces vibrant fashion. Color, proportion, embellishment and fabrication: the designer should be in control.

4. Visit (or create) the archive. Houses with storied-pasts require trips though those pasts. Recreate the story. Reinvent the story. The fashion label was bought for a reason, so use what is already on hand. Clean breaks from a couture house's history were once new and revolutionary, but by now it is a cliche. Use what is on hand.

- AP

16 décembre 2009

Sphinx: New Utterances


















From the Palmier Fountain in Paris, new divinations of future style:

F16: Poiret supposedly called Chanel's look 'poverty deluxe.' Now, we must consider 'scavenger chic' for the next six years as a serious possibility. Grim, yes. But still chic.

G24: 60 years from now: lemon lacquer lipstick. To our eyes, this is completely wrong. But it will look so right...

J73: The suit will still be with us. There is such comfort, history and engineering in the quintessence of Western male dress.

Q22: 2053 AD/CE: perhaps the Implant Wars will indeed happen if implants employ rubies, emeralds and diamonds.

15 décembre 2009

Evening Accessories and Accoutrements


















Gentle Reader -

A fashionable life once contained more than a gorgeous handbag. Irving Penn's stills of spilled contents opened up this secret world of pillboxes, small minaudières, and gold things.

Accessories and accoutrements can reveal more than a gorgeous dress. Just a thought as the season of gift-giving reaches its climax.

- AP

09 décembre 2009

Revolutionary Fashion - Mrs. Montresor


















Gentle Reader -

John Singleton Copley's portrait of Frances Montresor dates from about 1778. Is there an influence of the French court of Versailles? Possibly, since the French court dominated fashion during this period (note the hairstyle).

More importantly, this is very English fashion. Notice that this is a red coat.

The sportiness of the jacket, the military-derived details, the finish of the shirt - even the relaxed composure of Mrs. Montresor herself: this is a shining example of dash, which might be the English equivalent of French chic.

However dash came first.

If one compares the fashion in this portrait to decades of English styles that were to come, there seems to be a lingering inspiration. Not of Mrs. Montresor per se, but of the style she embodies here.

- AP

08 décembre 2009

For Lesage

 
Posted by Picasa









Gentle Reader -

This is a Chinese wallpaper from Blair House in Washington, DC. Perhaps it is potential inspiration for the French embroidery firm Lesage. Can you imagine this as an embroidered jacket, the way Lesage used to do for YSL?

The downside: the hours that would be involved to create it. Another reason why haute couture isn't what it used to be.

- AP